Archive for March, 2005

Software of Choice

March 31, 2005

Well, this is not as easy as it might seem…

I started with Family Tree Maker, at version 6.0. I upgraded to every version, including the latest, “Family Tree Maker 2005.”

However, an interesting thing happened along the way… I became somewhat disillusioned with this product’s support and development path. I have seen some nice UI cleanup along the way, and some admittedly nice-to-have features, reports, searches, etc… But in the 6+ upgrades, and the fairly hefty costs for said upgrades along the way, it just hasn’t seemed to provide enough bank for the buck to continue to justify my throwing money at this product.

Then, along came Family Tree Legends. A relatively young product (currently at version 4.0), this program has quite a pedigree behind it. I’ll let you research the authors and the company on your own at their website if it interests you, but suffice it to say that I found it compelling… I bought at the 3.x level, and have upgraded to their current offering.

I find it to be every bit as easy (if not more so) as my old standby, and I find a lot of features truely innovative, unique, and – at the risk of overusing the word – compelling.

However… I know consider these two products to be in a horse race – they’re neck-and-neck. I am currently maintaining both, because I’m stuck in analysis paralysis and can’t choose which one to throw all my weight towards… I can tell you that I’m leaning heavily in the direction of Legends (I’ll refer to them as FTL from now on).

With minor tweaks and additions, I believe this product will replace FTM/FTW (Family Tree Maker for Windows) easily as the de-facto standard.

I’ll get into my beefs and grips in a future post, as well as into my wishlist – and then we’ll see if anyone in cyberspace is listening.

Who am I?

March 31, 2005

In my Working Actor I class, which I took in October-November, 2004, one of our class lessons was dealing with Headshots, and how casting directors use them and are influenced by them.

It was fascinating and somewhat disturbing to realize that everything I knew (or thought I knew) about the process was basically wrong.

I was convinced that if I could picture myself in a given role, and could just get the “in” to prove to “them” that I could pull it off, then I could land any role I wanted.

What I learned was that the vast majority of the casting decision is done before you ever walk in the door – as a result of reviewing headshots.

The Casting Director is matching headshots against roles, plain and simple – does this headshot communicate to me (or more importantly, would it communicate to the audience) that this person *is* this part. They rarely (if ever) will put a person into a role that has to “sell themselves” (i.e., convince you). It detracts from the story if you are spending time having an internal debate as to whether the person is believable in that role. It needs to be right, and natural, right out of the gate, or you’re not going to get the part. As Gary and John say, “When you watch a movie or TV show, you accept those choices and move on with the narrative or find yourself taken out of the moment with a bad casting decision.”

So, by the time a Casting Director calls you in for an audition, they have already determined that you’re more-or-less right for the role. They now want to see three things:

  1. Do you look like the person in the headshot? (apparently, many people end up with very old headshots, or have dramatically changed their style or appearance, or they made themselves up in a never-to-be-seen-again arrangement, or their headshot was so retouched, etc., that it’s impossible to look in real life like the person in the picture)
  2. Can you act? (i.e., can you effectively portray the role you are attempting to?)
  3. Can you take direction (i.e., if the director tells you to change something about your audition, are you able to effect that change, without the rest of the persona crumbling around you? Are you willing to effect the change? Can you effect the change in the (very little) time provided?)

To help us grasp the importance of headshots and image, Gary and John gave us an exercise where they collected our headshots (or snapped some new ones if we didn’t have ours yet), and then put them all on a website for the class to review. Our task: Look at everyone elses headshot (not your own), and cast them in a role, based solely on the image itself, not anything you know or have learned about them in class. Identify roles or traits you feel the image conveys.

I did not yet have my headshot – that would come later. Gary took a quick one after class to use for the assignment (see it here)

Obviously, I was not dressed (or shaven) appropriately for the headshot… I would learn much more about headshots later in the class (and I’ll expand on that in a future post). That being said, though, it was interesting the feedback I received based on this look:

  • Assistant Professor
  • Computer Technician
  • Radio Station Engineer
  • Prison Guard
  • Policeman
  • Doorman
  • Chef
  • Public Utilities Employee
  • Fireman
  • Ringmaster (!?)
  • Convenience Store Clerk
  • News Cameraman
  • Barfly
  • Blue Collar Guy
  • Sports Fanatic
  • Bartender
  • Good ol’ Boy
  • Guys’ Guy
  • Unkempt
  • Weary
  • Aloof
  • Devious
  • Arrogant
  • Untrusting
  • Genuine
  • Confident
  • Relaxed
  • Dismissive
  • Wise Cracker
  • Smirky
  • Sarcastic
  • Lovable
  • Lovable (yes, it was submitted twice, so I report it twice)
  • Genuine
  • Humorous
  • Humble
  • Fun
  • Easy-Going
  • Loyal
  •  

Most of these were a) not how I saw myself, b) not how I imagined others saw me, c) not the types of roles I would have submitted myself for, and d) not necessarily the roles I wanted to pursue.

Then it was reality time… If you want to be a successful actor (definition of successful: “Working”), you need to market yourself (I’ll save marketing for a future post as well) for the roles you’re going to be selected for, not necessarily the ones you “want.”

Now don’t get me wrong – this whole image thing is not etched in stone – you can change your image –
as I did
.

This image, though we did not repeat the exercise, communicates more closely the image that I want, and should help me land the roles that I want… Though realistically, the two combined show flexibility as well. And ultimately, if either one get’s me an audition, I’ll take it. :)

Introduction

March 29, 2005

I will use this space to chronicle my interest, activities, successes, failures, inspirations, aspirations, etc., relating to my career in acting.

My name is Mark Jeweler. At the time of this writing, I am 38 years old. I live in Maryland with my wife of nearly 18 years, and my three sons: Brandon (13), Matthew (10), and Cory (7).

I have had a lifelong passion for acting, that was significantly hindered by genetic knee problems that first showed up when I was 12, and caused me to have chronic pain, and surgery every 20 months on average until receiving a Total Knee Replacement in 2001. Since then, I have a new lease on life, and am agressively pursuing my passion with every opportunity God gives me.

I am a born-again Christian, attending New Covenant Church, where I am also the director of the Performing Arts Ministry. I love Jesus with all my heart, soul, and strength, and believe that He has given me a gift and a love for the performing arts, which I intend to use as much as I can and all for His glory.

Thus far, I have had a few roles as an extra in various films and commercials, and a few small principal roles in commercials. I am taking voice lessons to improve my singing (though this is sporadic at best), and various acting classes and workshops to improve my acting and my ability to take direction.

I have taken a few classes at our local Community College, but far more valuable has been the Working Actor I workshop I took with Gary Wheeler and John Strawbridge, of the Actors Company Theatre. In future entries, I hope to expand on some of what I’ve learned. In any case, I highly recommend these workshops for actors of any skill or experience level.

Also, Gary Wheeler was my Headshot photographer. I was very pleased with the results as well as the process.

I also have been working extensively with my very good friend and former co-worker Houston Haynes on putting together some decent Voice-over demos (See sidebar for links to VO Demos).